Rb or vtt pcv valve?

RuskiRacer

Captain
Jul 17, 2019
1,209
757
0
Ride
2009 e93 335i
Upgrading my pcv and wanna hear people thoughts. To bad I can't hear from rob since he's banned
 

fmorelli

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Aug 11, 2017
3,749
3,596
0
57
Virginia
Ride
E89 Z4 35i, F10 535d
Why don't you share your thoughts, what matters to you? Then people can give feedback on what you would like. Both work just fine ... Rob's solution is well documented on forums.

Filippo
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Jeffman

RuskiRacer

Captain
Jul 17, 2019
1,209
757
0
Ride
2009 e93 335i
Why don't you share your thoughts, what matters to you? Then people can give feedback on what you would like. Both work just fine ... Rob's solution is well documented on forums.

Filippo
Mostly am just looking for a good quality upgrade I was looking into Rob's hose , pcv cap , and valve . Just wondering who's running what setup and how it's working for them.
 

fmorelli

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Aug 11, 2017
3,749
3,596
0
57
Virginia
Ride
E89 Z4 35i, F10 535d
Rob sells a low-side solution. Some folks run that with a BMS high side solution. I started with Rob's, then built my own custom setup. Here's how I would net it out: RBTurbo's solution is pretty simple and straightforward if you just want to slap a low-side solution in. Just add the catch can (which you can go Mishimoto or China knockoff). If you want modularity, to run various configurations, a complete low-side high-side solution, et cetera ... VTT has put a bunch of PCV capabilities on the market that are plug-n-play. You'll need to understand what you are trying to do with the VTT setup (choice inherently increases complexity), but you get extensibility in return.

Filippo
 

RuskiRacer

Captain
Jul 17, 2019
1,209
757
0
Ride
2009 e93 335i
Rob sells a low-side solution. Some folks run that with a BMS high side solution. I started with Rob's, then built my own custom setup. Here's how I would net it out: RBTurbo's solution is pretty simple and straightforward if you just want to slap a low-side solution in. Just add the catch can (which you can go Mishimoto or China knockoff). If you want modularity, to run various configurations, a complete low-side high-side solution, et cetera ... VTT has put a bunch of PCV capabilities on the market that are plug-n-play. You'll need to understand what you are trying to do with the VTT setup (choice inherently increases complexity), but you get extensibility in return.

Filippo
For now I will go with just a basic setup in the future I plan to go with the vtt valve cover because of the amount of options for crankcase relief. Thank you for your advice
 

Jeffman

Major
Jan 7, 2017
1,620
1
629
0
Rob sells a low-side solution. Some folks run that with a BMS high side solution.
Yep. This is what I do. Seems to work fine. Low side requires emptying ~3x more frequently than the high side, FYI. Still need to clean intake valves, however, unless you plug the intake PCV oil drip holes into the intake ports.
 

SSDD

Lurker
Jun 2, 2019
18
5
0
Ride
2009 E90 335i
Yep. This is what I do. Seems to work fine. Low side requires emptying ~3x more frequently than the high side, FYI. Still need to clean intake valves, however, unless you plug the intake PCV oil drip holes into the intake ports.

Is that considered the current best practice (Rob low side, BMS high side)?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RuskiRacer

Blaster3500

Sergeant
Nov 5, 2016
296
247
0
SC
You can buy just the external RB valve and build the rest of the kit. Just shoot him an email for pricing. That way you can run whatever hose and use whatever vac source you want. I have been running that with zero issues over the past couple years. I would add the BMS high side but I have limited space in the bay.
 

Torgus

Brigadier General
Nov 6, 2016
2,671
2,194
0
Boston
Ride
ACF 6466 E92 + METH
Is that considered the current best practice (Rob low side, BMS high side)?

That is what I run and what I would recommend to 99% of people. Or go with the M18 VC and Radium solution if you want to drop more coin.

RB FTW. You can email Rob at [email protected]
 

BOosted 335i

Sergeant
Jun 1, 2017
315
104
0
New Jersey
Ride
E90 BMW 335i
Yep. This is what I do. Seems to work fine. Low side requires emptying ~3x more frequently than the high side, FYI. Still need to clean intake valves, however, unless you plug the intake PCV oil drip holes into the intake ports.
Yeah wish the can was longer to help interval draining.mishimoto style can
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gavin

Terry@BMS

Sergeant
Platinum Vendor
Jan 23, 2017
462
379
50
We make a PCV also.. But check out our vacuums side OCC solution including a new PCV: https://www.burgertuning.com/products/n54-vacuum-side-occ-kit?_pos=1&_sid=d002bb892&_ss=r

mw-N54-vacuum-side-occ-bms-burger-tuning_1024x1024.jpg


-oil-catch-can-vacuum-side-burger-tuning_1024x1024.jpg
 

Terry@BMS

Sergeant
Platinum Vendor
Jan 23, 2017
462
379
50
What benefits does the vacuum side catch can provide I don't know anyone personally running it they all just have the high side

Depending on the car and engine wear you might get more in the intake path via the boost side or via the vacuum side. Initially the boost side was the main concern but as the cars get older we're seeing more oil control problems on the vacuum side cropping up so developed this kit so we have both sides covered. You can run one just one kit or both together. :)
 

Rafinha

New Member
Jul 8, 2019
6
6
0
Ride
335i E93 6SPD N54
Is that considered the current best practice (Rob low side, BMS high side)?
I run this setup with the mishimoto catch can, it works wonders man! Can’t go wrong with that one
 
  • Informative
Reactions: SSDD

Rob09msport

Major
Oct 28, 2017
1,929
664
0
Monroe CT
Ride
09 335i msport le mans 18 x5
Depending on the car and engine wear you might get more in the intake path via the boost side or via the vacuum side. Initially the boost side was the main concern but as the cars get older we're seeing more oil control problems on the vacuum side cropping up so developed this kit so we have both sides covered. You can run one just one kit or both together. :)
How does your system negate the need to plug head ports and does sharing the bov vac affect like a tial which calls for quarter inch line?
 

Terry@BMS

Sergeant
Platinum Vendor
Jan 23, 2017
462
379
50
How does your system negate the need to plug head ports and does sharing the bov vac affect like a tial which calls for quarter inch line?

The ports in the head we block with a double oring in our valve cover PCV fitting. The vacuum fitting source is large enough to feed both ports, no issues observed on that front.
 

Rob09msport

Major
Oct 28, 2017
1,929
664
0
Monroe CT
Ride
09 335i msport le mans 18 x5
K so it still is beneficial to block ports for very high boost and preventative correct ? Just not nec and thanks for clarifying the bov part I've always appreciated how responsive and helpful you have been i have used your products since the hot pill days lmao
 

135Pats

Specialist
Nov 17, 2016
70
48
0
MD
K so it still is beneficial to block ports for very high boost and preventative correct ? Just not nec and thanks for clarifying the bov part I've always appreciated how responsive and helpful you have been i have used your products since the hot pill days lmao
RB Low side, BMS high side (it flows very well), plug the ports. The last part is not necessary, but can be helpful if you're making big power.

Edit: Can also just VTA through a filter on the high side. Not a lot coming out from there so I found that a catch can just wasn't doing all that much in the first place. So, I vented it. Sorry trees ;)
 
Last edited: